Gregor spoke along with Cooper from Silver Maple Construction at Efficiency Vermont’s Better Buildings by Design (BBD) conference earlier this year.
Thank you to Karen Bushey who is an Energy Consultant for the Vermont Energy Investment Corporation (VEIC) who took part in our presentation.
You can view the presentation here.
Studio III has won “Best of Houzz 2016”.
This is the third year that Studio III has received this award for having one of the top 3% of design professionals’ portfolios on the popular Houzz residential design site.
This year Studio III was also designated a “Houzz Influencer”, for those professionals whose knowledge and advice are most highly valued by the Houzz community.
Visit Studio III architects’ portfolio: https://lnkd.in/daNz6hz
We’ve gained valuable experience in designing our first Passive House in Middlebury. We’re putting that experience to good use with our second Passive House, this time in Lincoln, VT. Passive House #2 is the spiritual twin of #1, but with a couple key differences.
First, most obviously, is the larger lot. The Middlebury site is a snug fit thanks to several competing setbacks, so the extra breathing room on a large site allows much more flexibility in placing the house. The house was placed on the north side of a clearing, so no trees had to be removed to get the best use of solar gain.
Second is the foundation structure. The dramatic topography of the Middlebury lot meant the inhabitable space would “float” over an unconditioned, partially open space, using either piles or concrete walls. On the flat plain where the Lincoln house sits, rather than go to the expense of digging and building typical concrete foundations and then insulating the floor cavity, we decided to go with a system used often by Maine Passive House designer Chris Corson: a raft slab foundation. In this system, an 8″ concrete slab is poured over a raft of 12″ thick EPS foam. The foam works both as the main floor insulation keeping heat in the house, as well as a blanket to keep the natural heat of the earth under the building, preventing frost from forming that would otherwise affect the integrity of the foundation. The 8″ slab is thick enough that no separate footings are required for structural reasons.
But apart from these differences, the house exhibits the same beauty and efficiency as the one in Middlebury. The various lessons we’ve learned and details we’ve revised from the first house have thus far contributed to a shorter period of construction relative to the first house (helped along by a very light start to winter). With Silver Maple Construction at the helm, we’ll have the quality of construction needed to get this house certified as the next Passive House in Vermont.
Studio III architects has adopted the 2030 Challenge!
The primary objectives of the 2030 Challenge are:
– to achieve the dramatic reduction in global fossil fuel consumption and GHG emissions of the built environment by changing the way cities, communities, infrastructure, and buildings, are planned, designed, and constructed and;
– the regional development of an adaptive, resilient built environment that can manage the impacts of climate change, preserve natural resources, and access low-cost, renewable energy resources.
Studio III is committed to contributing to a sustainable built environment, providing Passive House and Energy Star rated buildings.
Please check out this great video about The 2030 Challenge: https://vimeo.com/22702981
…and here’s a link to The 2030 Challenge website
and a list of firms that have adopted the challenge, including Studio III!
…and a very happy, healthy New Year to everyone, from Studio III!
Just before Thanksgiving, the Passive House was graced by students from the STEM Academy, part of the Patricia A. Hannaford Career Center in Middlebury, VT. For anyone interested in pursuing careers in engineering and architecture, the opportunity to tour a Passive House is a chance to see the future of building standards in action. The students were guided by lead architect Gregor Masefield, founder of Studio III Architecture, and lead builder Chris North, co-owner of Northern Timbers Construction.
Compared to Europe, where an industry for passive building has been developing since the first Passivhaus was built in Darmstadt, Germany in 1991, passive building in the United States is in its infancy. PHIUS’s database lists about 150 certified projects across the county, with only 5 in Vermont. This house will be the 6th. Meanwhile, passive buildings in Europe number in the tens of thousands. The industry there is so well-established that construction of a passive building in Germany only costs 5-7% more than a regular building, a cost that is more than made up for by energy savings over the life of the building. But even in the US construction costs only run 5-10% more for new buildings, and those costs continue to go down as the industry expands and more people come to recognize the value of the PH standard.
As a consumer, you might think, “Housing is expensive as is. Why should I bother with the higher cost of construction when fuel is so cheap right now?” The price of fuel changes as often as the weather; nothing can guarantee today’s low prices won’t disappear with the next political crisis. But more to the point, we can no longer pretend that our current low standards of building are even remotely sustainable, and it is impossible to ignore the effects of poor construction on the global climate. With the international climate talks beginning today in Paris, the time is ripe for a dramatic shift in the way consumers look at construction.
One day, the Passive House standard will be the minimum requirement for building. The sooner people adopt it not just as a building code, but as a cultural mindset, the better it will be for everyone. We hope the students came away from this tour with some insight into the exciting challenges they’ll encounter.
